With non-financial reporting requirements now known to be an
important feature of what it means to be a responsible corporate player in the
global economy, businesses must be able to demonstrate transparency and back up
any human rights claims made.
This regulatory priority is a global issue that will drive future
investment channels and demands from major shareholders, according to Harvard
University professor John Ruggie, speaking at the recent International Bar
Association (IBA) conference in Vienna.
In a showcase session at the conference, former UN Secretary
General Kofi Annan and Ruggie participated in a discussion chaired by Herbert
Smith Freehills partner, Stéphane Brabant and facilitated by Jane Nelson,
Director of the Corporate Social Responsibility Initiative at Harvard Kennedy
School.
The discussion explored the history of the United Nations Guiding
Principles on Business and Human Rights (Guiding Principles) and the role
lawyers must play in implementing them, with Kofi Annan emphasising that
“lawyers have a critical role to play in building healthy and prosperous
societies”.
The second part of the session focused on the application of
business and human rights in practice, discussing the implications of the
Guiding Principles for lawyers' daily practice and the legal advice they provide
to private sector clients. This session highlighted the increasing material
risks for companies that fail to properly address human rights issues as part
of their core strategy.
The panel featured multinational companies represented by their
general counsel and a chief ethics officer, as well as leading international
NGOs represented by their executive directors, chairmen and CEOs.
The session gathered 700 lawyers from across the world and raised
significant awareness of business and human rights among participants.
The annual IBA conference reunites approximately 6000 lawyers for
a week of sessions, training, and business development opportunities.
Stéphane Brabant serves as senior co-chair of the IBA’s Corporate
Social Responsibility Committee and he had been planning this session for
several months, with assistance from associates Elsa Savourey in Paris and
Maximilian Szymanski in London, both of whom joined him at the conference.
Top 5 takeaways for business
How do you know you respect human rights? Businesses need to be
able to back up their claims and show transparency throughout their supply
chains and statements of policy must be embedded effectively in corporate
processes. As such, Kofi Annan states it was a deliberate decision of the UN to
make transparency and corporate reporting a key element of the UN Global
Compact and in the Guiding Principles.
Non-financial reporting requirements will become a “global phenomenon” that will drive future investment channels and demands from major shareholders, according to Professor John Ruggie.
Lawyers, including in-house counsel, will have an increasingly
critical role to play in ensuring companies deal properly with human rights
risks—companies that involve their lawyers in implementation of human rights
policies are doing a better job overall and lawyers (in some companies) are
playing a critical role in integrating human rights considerations into due
diligence processes, contracts and other corporate functions etc.
Business and human rights will present material risks for
organisations going forward.
“The time for soft law vs hard law is finished” according to
Stephane Brabant in his session wrap-up. Chris Jochnick backed this up,
discussing that even though principles like the UNGPs are “soft law” they
provide a benchmark and civil society (ie NGOs) will scrutinize corporate
conduct by reference to the UNGPs and will highlight violations.
-Conventus Law
No comments:
Post a Comment