According
to the new Companies Act, certain classes of profitable entities are required
to shell out at least two per cent of their three-year annual average net
profit towards the CSR activities.
The high-level committee set up by the government on monitoring
CSR activities has said that the government should have no role in monitoring
of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) expenditure by corporates and this
should be the job of their respective boards and managements.
Further, the committee headed by former home secretary Anil
Baijal, has suggested uniform tax treatment for all CSR activities carried out
under the new Companies Act while recommending leniency towards non-compliant
companies in the initial 2-3 years of the implementation.
According to the new Companies Act, certain classes of profitable
entities are required to shell out at least two per cent of their three-year
annual average net profit towards the CSR activities. Last fiscal 2014-15 was
the first year of implementation of the provision and compliance reports for
the same would be available by the end of this year.
“CSR should not be interpreted as a source of financing the gaps
in inclusive growth. Use of corporate innovations and management skills in the
delivery of public goods is at the core of CSR implementation by the
companies,” the six-member committee said while adding that since the initial
period is the learning phase, CSR should be reviewed after three years.
Ruling out the need to monitor the CSR spend by firms, the panel
said that the existing principle of ‘comply or explain’ is sufficient for the
time being and “the government should have no role to play in engaging external
experts for monitoring the quality and efficacy of CSR spend. The boards and
the management are sufficiently empowered to engage any external firm if they
want.”
According to the committee, differential tax treatment for
expenditure on various CSR activities may create unforeseen distortion in
allocation of funds across development sectors wherein the board’s decision
could be guided more by tax savings implications “rather than compelling
community social needs. The committee therefore feels that there should be
uniformity in tax treatment for CSR expenditure across all eligible
activities”. Currently, certain activities such as contribution to the Prime
Minister’s National Relief Fund qualify for tax exemption.
Seeking more clarity
on applicability of the CSR provisions on foreign companies, the panel urged
the government to look more deeply into the issue even as it recommended that
section 8 — non-profit firms — should be exempt from the compliance.
-The Indian Express
No comments:
Post a Comment