
Of executives surveyed,
87% rate reputation risk as either more important or much more important
than any other strategic risks their companies face, according to a new study from Forbes Insights and Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
Limited. Further, 88% say their companies are explicitly focusing on
managing reputation risk.
Yet a bevy of factors
contribute to reputation risk, making monitoring and mitigating the dangers
seem particularly unwieldy. These include business decisions and performance in
the following areas:
Financial performance: Shareholders,
investors, lenders, and many other stakeholders consider financial performance
when assessing a firm’s reputation.
Quality: An
organization’s willingness to adhere to quality standards goes a long way to
enhancing its reputation. Product defects and recalls have an adverse impact.
Innovation: Firms
that differentiate themselves from their competitors through innovative
processes and unique/niche products tend to have strong name recognition and
high reputation value.
Ethics and integrity: Firms
with strong ethical policies are more trustworthy in the eyes of stakeholders.
Crisis response: Stakeholders
keep a close eye on how a company responds to difficult situations. Any action
during a crisis can ultimately affect the company’s reputation.
Safety: Strong
safety policies affirm that safety and risk management are top strategic
priorities for the company, building trust, and value creation.
Corporate social
responsibility: Actively promoting sound environmental management and social
responsibility programs helps create a reputation “safety net” that reduces
risk.
Security: Strong
infrastructure to defend against physical and cybersecurity threats helps avoid
security breaches that could damage a company’s reputation.
But brand crises make
headlines with increasing frequency, and companies are laying responsibility at
the feet of the C-suite, particularly chief risk officers. Deloitte reports
that respondents considered the primary responsibility to rest with: the chief
executive officer (36%), chief risk officer (21%), board of directors (14%), or
chief financial officer (11%).
What can they do? The
study offered these key points to consider when crafting a crisis management
plan:
·
Don’t wait until a crisis hits to get ready. Monitoring,
preparation and rehearsal are the most effective ways to get ready for a crisis
event. Organizations that can plan and rehearse potential crisis scenarios
should be better positioned to respond effectively when a crisis actually hits.
·
Every decision during a major crisis can affect stakeholder value.
Reputation risks destroy value more quickly than operational risks.
·
Response times should be in minutes, not hours or days. Teams on
the ground need to take control, lead with flexibility, make decisions with
less-than-perfect information, communicate well internally and externally, and
inspire confidence. This often requires outside-the-box thinking and
innovation.
·
You can emerge stronger. Almost every crisis creates opportunities
for companies to rebound. However, those opportunities will surface only if
you’re looking for them.
·
When a crisis seems like it’s over, it’s not. The work goes on
long after you breathe a sigh of relief. The way you capture and manage data,
log decisions, manage finances, handle insurance claims, and meet legal
requirements on the road back to normality can determine how strongly you
recover.
But the real objective
should be preventing these potential crises to begin with.
-The National Law Review
No comments:
Post a Comment